Sunday, October 18, 2009

Social Media Revolution


Statistics Show Social Media Is Bigger Than You Think

Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life:

"The Democratization of Online Social Networks," "Adults on Social Network Sites, 2005-2009," and "The Internet and Civic Engagement."

Dallas Morning News, October 12, 2009: "Seniors finding social networking exhilarating."

Video from the book, "Socialnomics: How social media transforms the way we live and do business," written by Erik Qualman and published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [Amazon]


Through extensive research, Erik Qualman shares statistics explaining just how prevalent social media has become in our business and personal lives:
  • Social Media has overtaken porn as the #1 activity on the Web
  • If Facebook were a country it would be the 4th largest in population size
  • Generation Y and Z consider e-mail passé…In 2009 Boston College stopped distributing e-mail addresses to incoming freshmen
  • 80% of Tweets happen on mobile devices
  • 24 of the 25 largest newspapers are experiencing record declines in circulation because we no longer search for the news, the news finds us.
  • More than 1.5 million pieces of content (web links, news stories, blog posts, notes, photos, etc.) are shared on Facebook...daily.
  • 78% of consumers trust peer recommendations; only 14% trust advertisements
  • The fastest growing segment on Facebook is 55-65 year-old females
SOCIALNOMICS proves that social media is NOT a fad, rather it is a fundamental shift in the way we communicate.

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Political Campaign Opportunities in the Digital Age


Disruptive Innovation
The term "disruptive technology" was coined by Clayton M. Christensen in his 1995 article "Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave" and 1997 book "The Innovator's Dilemma."

In his follow-on book, "The Innovator's Solution," Christensen, an Oxford Rhodes Scholar, Harvard Business School Professor and much sought after business speaker, revised the term "disruptive technology" to "disruptive innovation."

Christensen recognized that few technologies are intrinsically disruptive or sustaining in character. Rather, it is the innovative strategy or business model that the technology enables that creates a disruptive impact.
Christensen: “The disruptive innovation theory points to situations in which new organizations can use relatively simple, convenient, low-cost innovations to create growth and triumph over powerful incumbents. The theory holds that existing incumbents have a high probability of beating entrant attackers when the contest is about sustaining innovations. But established incumbents almost always lose to attackers armed with disruptive innovations. . ."
In effect, "Disruptive Innovation" can change the rules of the game! Without the internet, Barack Obama would still be the junior senator from Illinois.

Under the old media rules of the political game, a young man with a funny name and a couple of years in the Senate might run honorably, but would almost certainly lose, crushed by the ability of an experienced candidate like Hillary Clinton to raise money from big donors and lock up endorsements from elected officials and party activists.

But, Barack Obama declared his candidacy in 2007, not in 1991, and his two-year campaign for the White House applied the principals of disruptive innovation in his use of new media technologies to overcome inherent advantages of well established incumbent candidates, like Hillary Clinton and John McCain.

Disruptive Communication Strategies

The new media communication strategies are disruptive to the old 20th century style campaign organization and communication strategies. The medium is the message, and like radio, the telephone and television before it, the internet has radically altered who is electable. Before television, there was a dramatically different set of candidates who could win that didn’t have a chance once television emerged.

At first, campaigning on TV was viewed as a gimmick and was given to young staffers to experiment with. Over time, television asserted itself as the dominant form of political communication — remaking our nation’s politics in the process. If that progression sounds familiar, it’s because we’re reliving it today.

It’s about how the social web is rapidly becoming the default place where people spend their time and discuss issues that matter to them. It will be about how much society has integrated itself into it. Citizens are quickly becoming accustomed to being a fan of their congressman on Facebook, because it will soon become one of the main ways in which they communicate with him

New media leads voters to “expect more personalized, dynamic and interactive communications”, as Natch Greyer said of social media in the March 2011 US edition of Campaigns & Elections. What is more effective in creating a personal, dynamic and interactive relationship than face-to-face communications? The answer, of course, is nothing.

A step back from the hyper-focus on social media to view how technology has affected politics in the past will provide better context to this inquiry. The arrival of the printing press in the late medieval period led to leaps forward in literacy rates, the Enlightenment and rationalism. In turn, it allowed a new form of mass identity and organization hitherto impossible. The written word did not simply allow for mass society, but also detached the argument from the author, allowing a new discourse remote from emotional ties enabling great scientific discoveries.

Obama's 2008 Presidential Win Changed Political Campaigning


World's Top Digital Marketing
Experts call the race
HuffingtonPost: Clinton Slams Online Democratic Activists For Her Primary Losses to Obama.

It should be obvious from Obama's 2008 Presidential Election that the web would begin to make a difference in political campaigning. But, there is still hesitation to use the Internet extensively in political campaigns.

Hillary Clinton's 2008 presidential campaign dismissed the Internet many campaigns still ignore Internet mass media audiences and focus exclusively on old-school direct mail, phone banking, block walking and television. Less than 10% of political consultants believe the internet is an effective channel to reach voters.

What accounts for candidates’ and consultants’ delay in embracing digital strategies, including online web advertising? Many political strategists dismiss the Internet because they think it does not reach the “right” people. For them the Internet is seen as a medium for the younger generation who do not vote in the same numbers as, say, older retired voters.

New Media Political Paradigm Shift

Huffingtonpost: "Social media" is merely a way to describe new tools in an old and narrow paradigm.
However, this term has become obsolete in a world where technology has become a critical tool for connecting people not only to information and ideas, but also to other individuals, entities. The term "social media" as we know it today appeared in July 2004 as a reference to participatory media like blogging, wikis, social networks, and related technologies.

This is all well and good if technology was still primarily about connecting people to information, which is really the essence of media. In this networked century, where access to technology is increasing exponentially, almost everybody is reachable. But more importantly, almost everybody has the ability to connect.

This new ability to connect is leveling the playing field and breaking down previous age, gender, socioeconomic, and circumstantial barriers to who can emerge as a leader, activist, or grassroots agent for change. The power of technology today will be determined not by web traffic and viewership, but by its ability to strengthen and more importantly facilitate connections in real time.

Read the full article at HuffingtonPost
This post continues with several videos after the "Read more" jump. First up are four interview segments that Peter Leyden, former Director of the New Politics Institute, did for LinkTV in September 2008, as commentary for their airing of a documentary on the 2004 election. The first Leyden video segment introduces the new media political paradigm shift that occurred in the 2008 election cycle. Additional videos follow the Leyden videos providing more background on the new media revolution in 21st century politics.

Obama's 2012 New Media Campaign

After President Barack Obama launched his 2012 campaign earlier this year his campaign team sent emails, tweets and Facebook messaging, including Facebook ads to ask nearly 13 million followers supporters from his 2008 campaign contact list to declare on Facebook "I'm In!" for Obama's 2012 re-election campaign.

Emails to supporters seek small-dollar donations in exchange for campaign coffee mugs or a chance to win dinner with the president. The campaign's website helps supporters find local events, plan meetings and raise money while its digital team develops the next big thing.

If Obama broke new ground in 2008 using email, text messages and the Web to reach voters, Obama version 2.0 campaign strategy plans to take the new media Web campaign to the next level – by taking advantage of the expansive roles that the Internet and social media are playing in voters' lives.

"The successful [2012] campaign is going to be one that integrates all the various elements of the digital channel – email, text, website, mobile apps, and social networks – together as one digital program and also mixing the digital program together with the offline reality of field organizations," said Joe Rospars, the Obama campaign's chief digital strategist.

"In the end," Rospars said, "all the digital stuff is in service of the offline organizing to ultimately persuading voters and turning them out."

Obama took advantage of a strong Internet campaign in 2008 to raise an estimated $500 million online while regularly communicating with supporters through text messages, an email list estimated at more than 13 million and content on his 2008 My Barack Obama campaign website:

When Obama was close to announcing his vice presidential selection of Joe Biden in August 2008, the campaign encouraged supporters to find out by text message, a move that prompted more than 2 million people to voluntarily give their cell phone number to the Obama campaign.

Three years later, social media outlets like Facebook and Twitter have exploded, smart phones and apps are more prevalent, tablet computers are on the rise, and most Americans are online. When Obama announced his presidential campaign in 2007, Facebook had fewer than 20 million users worldwide. That number has now surpassed 500 million.

"There's no online and offline organizing. There's organizing," said Jeremy Bird, Obama's national field director, during a session at Netroots Nation in Minneapolis.

Obama's Campaign 2012 Holy Grail Of Digital Campaigning

Barack Obama's re-election campaign for the White House is poised to launch its secret weapon: an online tool that the campaign hopes will vastly increase its ability to mobilize volunteers and potential voters across the US.

The new tool, called Dashboard, is being seen as the possible Holy Grail of digital political organizing, one that has eluded campaign chiefs for years. It is already being road-tested in several of the crucial swing states that Obama must hold onto if he is to remain in office.

The technology has been incorporated into the campaign's website, myBarackObama.com, and is expected to be made available to thousands of staff and volunteers across the country within the next 10 days. Its URL can be found through search, though it remains inaccessible to most Obama supporters until the launch.

For the past eight years, online experts working within both parties, but particularly within the Democratic party, have aspired to create the first fully formed digital campaign. That goal may now be within their grasp.

The hope of Dashboard is that data acquired by volunteers from voters canvassing in Ohio will immediately be synced with that gathered by those running phone banks in New Hampshire and with the outreach efforts of volunteers at myBarackObama.com, giving campaign bosses a real-time master view of the president's re-election efforts throughout the country.

The Dashboard project is being led by Michael Slaby, one of Obama's digital gurus, along with Joe Rospars and Teddy Goff and Obama's director of field organizing Jeremy Bird. Collectively, they have been quietly reinventing traditional presidential races for the wired age.

They have put together a team of more than 100 statisticians, predictive modellers, data mining experts, mathematicians, software engineers, bloggers, internet advertising experts and online organizers at the Obama For America headquarters in downtown Chicago, which has been laboring since its start to craft a new generation of digital campaign tools.

They are keeping specific details about Dashboard heavily under wraps for fear that they might lose the substantial advantage they now enjoy over their rivals in the Romney campaign.

They have also been keen not to reveal the tool until it has undergone substantial testing by staff. All that the Obama team will say is that it represents a major step forward that could "make a huge difference in how we organize for 2012".

Dashboard, they add, will allow any volunteer for the first time "to join, connect with and build your neighborhood team online".

The cutting-edge tool seeks to put in place what Obama's digital gurus tried to achieve in 2008 but ran out of time and resources within that presidential election cycle. Its aim is to amplify the electoral impact of campaign organizers and volunteers on the ground by connecting them to each other in real time and to the central HQ through the internet.

The hope is that it will become the election equivalent of the Facebook games CityVille and FarmVille, where online participants cooperate with their social networks to run a city or manage a farm. In this case, Dashboard's creators hope to bring the power of the social networking right to the doorstep of the American voter.

Staffers in key districts of vital swing states will be able to instantly access data on people in their locality who have subscribed to myBarackObama.com's e-mail list and might be willing to volunteer their time. In past elections, local staff and activists couldn't easily piggyback off the campaign's internet operation, and relied primarily on their own contacts and local knowledge about who to approach.

Volunteers will also be able to log in to Dashboard through their mobile phones, giving them instant data on potential supporters and Obama voters as they canvass a neighborhood.

"The Holy Grail for political organizers is the ability to see what impact you are having as you go door to door," said Eli Pariser, former director of the liberal campaigning website Moveon.org and CEO of the new sharing site Upworthy. "If Dashboard works as billed, it will import into politics the kind of feedback loops we are familiar with from Facebook and online games."

Pariser also suggested that Dashboard could increase the contrast, already visible this year, between the Obama campaign's emphasis on on-the-ground engagement with voters, and the focus on negative TV advertising favored by the Romney campaign and the Republican strategist Karl Rove. "The Obama campaign takes engaging with voters seriously and that's something that sets it apart from the majority of campaigns – Republican or Democratic," Pariser said.

One of the key qualities of Dashboard, built into its make-up, is competitiveness. The tool's designers hope that by making local data available to volunteers and staff, it will encourage neighborhood teams to have a healthy ambition to be the best in meeting targets for the number of calls made, doors knocked upon and new voters registered.

"It's like a personal fundraising thermometer, but at scale and applied to field organizing," Teddy Goff, the Obama campaign's digital director told Rolling Stone earlier this year.

Dashboard could prove to be a powerful weapon for the Democrats not just in 2012 but in future Congressional and presidential races. The Guardian understands that unlike previous efforts, where digital innovations have been owned by Rospars' private company, Blue State Digital, Dashboard has been built from scratch in-house by the Obama re-election team.

It is not clear what will happen to the technology after 6 November, but it is likely that the Democratic National Committee, the party's organizational hub, will want to keep a handle on it.

Campaign Web Wars 2012 - Republicans Strike Back

Raw Story

Tired of playing catch-up to the Obama Internet juggernaut, Republicans have rolled out a one-stop online shop for conservative activism which they hope will help them capture the White House.

The Social Victory Center, which launched this week and allows Republicans to do everything from distribute campaign materials to ring up undecided voters in battleground states like Ohio, has been craftily embedded in the most comprehensive social media landscape of them all: Facebook.

Call it the Republican National Committee’s newest weapon in campaign web wars 2.0, the virtual battlefield of the 2012 election. But is Democratic President Barack Obama’s huge advantage in Facebook, Twitter, digital advertising and online fundraising already unassailable?

The web emerged as a star campaign player in 2008, and Obama used it to unprecedented effect to thump rival John McCain. Now Republicans are re-arming.

“We lost the technology battle in the 2008 cycle, without a doubt, and we could not stand by and get away with just having (campaign) centers make telephone calls and knock on doors,” RNC political director Rick Wiley told AFP at the committee’s Washington headquarters.

“We had to develop something that took on the Obama campaign’s presence on the web.”

Romney, the presumptive nominee, needs a vibrant online presence to galvanize support as his campaign enters a summer lull before the party nominating conventions in late August.

In its new app the RNC seeks to recreate the volunteer experience online, eliminating geographic boundaries to allow Republicans in red states like Texas to impact the dozen or so swing states that will decide the November election.

Both sides have capitalized on YouTube to stream press conferences, weekly addresses or online campaign videos for free, making the medium the “fireside chats” of their era.

But social media in particular will have an extraordinary impact in 2012.

“I can tell you right now that social marketing will swing millions of votes in this election,” said Scott Klososky, an author and expert on social technology.

“It will also allow candidates to target demographics in completely new ways and that will be key for the GOP.”

Read the full story @ Raw Story

The Internet and Campaign 2010

PewInternet: Fully 73% of adult internet users (representing 54% of all U.S. adults) went online to get news or information about the 2010 midterm elections, or to get involved in the campaign in one way or another. We refer to these individuals as "online political users" and our definition includes anyone who did at least one of the following activities in 2010:
  • Get political news online - 58% of online adults looked online for news about politics or the 2010 campaigns, and 32% of online adults got most of their 2010 campaign news from online sources.
  • Go online to take part in specific political activities, such as watch political videos, share election-related content or "fact check" political claims - 53% of adult internet users did at least one of the eleven online political activities we measured in 2010.
  • Use Twitter or social networking sites for political purposes - One in five online adults (22%) used Twitter or a social networking site for political purposes in 2010.1

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

New Era Of Campaign Messaging Through Conversation


Political Campaign Case Studies

WSJ Online: Services like Twitter, Facebook and Google Wave create a constant stream of interaction among users—for better or worse. Email has had a good run as king of communications -- But its reign is over.

In its place, a new generation of services is starting to take hold—services like Twitter and Facebook and countless others vying for a piece of the new world.

And just as email did more than a decade ago, this shift promises to profoundly rewrite the way we communicate online through conversation -— in ways we can only begin to imagine.

We all still use email, of course -- But email was better suited to the way we used to use the Internet—logging off and on, checking our messages in bursts.

Now, we are always connected, whether we are sitting at a desk or on a mobile phone. The always-on connection, in turn, has created a host of new ways to promote conversations that are much faster and more effective than email, and more fun.

Web Ads: Internet Politicians


Joe Trippi on Politics and the Web
Democrats more successfully used digital media and social networking tools like YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, Email, Test Messaging and a variety of other digital age tools than Republicans in the 2006 and 2008 election cycles.

Unfortunately, Republican candidates and conservative advocacy groups are also adopting advanced digital campaign strategies at a rapid pace.

Tea party groups, conservative advocacy groups and GOP candidates, like incumbent Gov. Rick Perry, are moving rapidly to supplement and even replace the standard 20th century campaign practices with 21st century advanced digital campaign strategies.

Rick Perry's campaign in particular has so far ignored traditional campaign efforts in favor of an Internet-based strategy. Perry's campaign strategy seems to to be shaping up to use online social media and contextual advertising to drive people to a rich-media campaign website that is continually updated with video shorts, including TV-style campaign ads. [DMN: Gov. Rick Perry's campaign is more text than talk | PBS: Republicans Hope to Maintain Social Media Edge into Midterm Elections | Wired White House Looks to Harness New Media | also see - "Republican New Media Caucus" | Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott's new media campaign - google]

Bill White's Web Ads are popping everywhere. [White was the Democratic Candidate ramping up to run for Kay Bailey Hutchinson's (R) Senate Seat, but switched races in late 2009 to run against incumbent Tx Gov. Rick for the 2010 election] Below are two examples of Bill White Web Ads that appeared in interesting places.

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

Gen Dems: The Party's Advantage Among Young Voters Widens

Pew Research Center for the People & the Press: Trends in the opinions of America's youngest voters are often a barometer of shifting political winds. And that appeared to be the case in 2008.
  • 58% of voters under age 30 identified or leaned toward the Democratic Party, compared with 33% for the GOP. The Democratic Party's 2008 lead among young voters doubled from 11 points to 25 points from 2004 to 2008.
  • Twice as many women voters under age 30 identify with or lean toward the Democratic Party as favor the Republican Party (63% vs. 28%)
  • 66% of under-30's supported Obama; far higher than in any previous election - compared to 31% for McCain.
  • Obama secured 71% of young first time voters compared to McCain's 29% of first-time voters. [DailyMail]
  • Online facts: 90% of adults under age 30 and 70% of adults age 50-64 regularly use the internet. 50% of adults under age 18-29 say the Internet is their main news source.

Age 18-29 Voter 66% Landslide For Obama: A New Generation Of Activism

The Millennial "WE Generation" Comes of Age - blog.gen-we.com

Generation WE : The Movement Begins...
Obama received a blowout 66% of the national vote among the 18-29 year old age group in 2008 compared to McCain's 33% of that vote. Obama even won the youth vote in many Republican states like Texas, where he won 54% of the vote.

The youth also voted 63% for House Democrats in 2008 -- Young voters not only voted for Obama at the top of the ballot, they also voted down ballot or straight ticket for other Democratic candidates.

18 percent of the 2008 electorate was made of the 18-29 year old age group and by 2016, they will be 100 million strong and positioned to dominate the American political scene for 30-40 years.
[ GEN WE 2008 POST ELECTION DATA PDF]

On Point Discussion On Gen Web


Discussion on Gen Web [46:00]
The Internet is producing the most socially plugged in, caught up, networked and aware generation since — ever? Listen to this hour of On Point discussion on Gen Web.

A big new study looked at new American youth culture unfolding on the Internet.

Monday, October 12, 2009

71% of Online Adults Regularly View Online Videos

The Pew Research Center has released a new video-sharing study that found 71 percent of online adults say they regularly watch videos on a video-sharing sites such as YouTube or Vimeo.

That represents a five-percentage-point increase from the 66% of online adults who reported being video-sharing site users a year earlier and a 38-point increase from five years ago when the Pew Internet Project took its first reading on use of such sites.

The Pew study further found that non-white adult internet users have higher rates of video-sharing site use than their white counterparts, a consistent finding since 2006.

Overall, 69% of white internet users said they had visited video-sharing sites, 13 points higher than in April 2009, and more than double the 31% reported when the question was first asked in December 2006.

At the same time, 79% of online non-whites -- African-Americans, Hispanics and others -- reported using video-sharing sites. That figure is 12 points higher than April 2009, and 41 points higher than in 2006.

More People Rely On The Internet Than Newspapers For News

Pew Research Center for the People & the Press report for 2010: In 2010, for the first time, the internet surpassed television as the main source of national and international news for people younger than 30. (chart right)

Since 2007, the number of 18 to 29 year old adults citing the internet as their main source has nearly doubled, from 34% to 65%.

Over this period, the number of young people citing television as their main news source has dropped from 68% to 52%.

The internet is slowly closing in on television as Americans’ main source of national and international news.

Television remains the most widely used source for national and international news – 66% of Americans say it is their main source of news – but that is down from 74% three years ago and 82% as recently as 2002.

Pew Report: Looking For Voters? Find Them On FaceBook

Pew Internet and American Life Project: Nearly half of all U.S. adults use some kind of social-networking site, from Facebook to LinkedIn, and these people are more likely to vote and be politically active.

The Pew report found that 79 percent of U.S. adults use the Internet, and 59 percent of these Internet users also use social networking. This is nearly twice as many as in 2008, and they are getting older, the report found.

“Among other things, this means the average age of adult social networking site users has shifted from 33 in 2008 to 38 in 2010,” the report states. “Over half of all adult SNS users are now over the age of 35. Some 56 percent of SNS users now are female.”

And despite LinkedIn’s stunning IPO last month, Facebook rules when it comes to social networking, with 92 percent of people who use social networking on Facebook, 29 percent on MySpace, 18 percent on LinkedIn, and 13 percent on Twitter.

Social networking can be a powerful tool for political organizing, the report finds.

Pew Studies Emergence of Non-Profit Online News Sites

Pew’s Project for Excellence in Journalism is out with a new study that looks at the new universe of nonprofit journalism. The study looked at who is publishing news under the legal structure of a 501(c)3 exemption. After all, “nonprofit” signals a tax status, not a belief system or a commitment to any particular fair and balanced set of ideals, journalistic or otherwise.

In 1910, nearly 60% of cities had competing daily papers, but today that completion of viewpoints has all but disappeared. More than two-thirds of independently-owned newspapers have disappeared over the last 35 years with more than 200 publishing companies disappearing over the last 20 years. Vin Crosbie, a noted Syracuse University professor and consultant, has predicted that more than half of the approximately 1,400 daily newspapers publishing in the country today could be out of business by 2020.

Newspaper publishers have reduced daily newsroom staffing by more than 29% from since 2001 as circulation and advertising revenues have plummeted over the last decade. Every year there are fewer and fewer newspaper reporters covering state capitols and city halls, while the number of states with newspapers covering the U.S. Congress full-time has dwindled from 35 in 1985 to just 21 in 2010.

As traditional newsrooms have shrunk, a group of institutions and funders motivated by something other than profit are entering the journalism arena. This distinguishes them from the commercial news institutions that dominated the 20th century, whose primary sources of revenue—advertising and circulation—were self-evident. The emergence of these new online news sources is significant since a national survey by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, conducted Dec. 1-5, 2010, found that more people cite the internet than newspapers as their main source of news.

Sunday, October 11, 2009

Fastest Growing Democratic Demographic Is Cellphone Only

The prevalence and use of wireless telephones (also known as cellular telephones, cell phones, or mobile phones) has changed substantially over the past decade. Today, an ever-increasing number of adults have chosen to use wireless telephones rather than landline telephones to make and receive all phone calls.

December 22, 2011 update - In the first 6 months of 2011, more than 3 of every 10 households (31.6%) did not have a landline telephone but did have at least one wireless telephone according to a CDC survey covering the January-June 2011 period. Approximately 30.2% of all adults (approximately 69 million adults) lived in households with only wireless telephones; 36.4% of all children (approximately 27 million children) lived in households with only wireless telephones.

The percentage of households that are wireless-only has been steadily increasing. The 1.9-percentage-point increase from the last 6 months of 2010 through the first 6 months of 2011 is not quite as large as the 3.1-percentage-point increase from the first 6 months of 2010 to the last 6 months of 2010. However, it is similar in size to the increases observed for the previous two 6-month periods. A 1.8-percentage-point increase was observed from the first 6 months of 2009 through the last 6 months of 2009, and a 2.1-percentage-point increase was observed from the last 6 months of 2009 through the first 6 months of 2010.

The percentage of adults living in wireless-only households has also been increasing steadily (Figure 1). During the first 6 months of 2011, 3 of every 10 adults lived in wireless-only households. One year before that (i.e., during the first 6 months of 2010), one of every four adults lived in wireless-only households, and 2 years before that (i.e., during the first 6 months of 2008), only one of every six adults lived in wireless-only households.

The percentage of children living in wireless-only households is also growing. In fact, as seen in Figure 1 and Table 1, the percentage of children living in wireless-only households has been increasing substantially faster since 2009 than the percentage of adults living in wireless-only households.

The Landline Gap


Full story on the growing landline gap @
Fastest Growing Democratic Demographic Is Cellphone Only

Communicating With Social Media

Smartphones Rapidly Replacing Computers For Internet Access

Pew Internet & American Life Project highlight the breakneck speed consumers are adopting smartphones as their preferred Internet access device — faster than just about any high-tech product in history. The Pew Internet Project research survey finds that one third of American adults – 35% – have adopted smartphones in the last four years, an adoption trend that shows no sign of slowing! The Project’s May survey found that 83% of US adults have a cell phone of some kind, and that 42% of them own a smartphone. That translates into 35% of all adults.

Several demographic groups have high levels of smartphone adoption, including the financially well-off and well-educated, non-whites, and those under the age of 45.

Some 87% of smartphone owners access the internet or email on their handheld, including two-thirds (68%) who do so on a typical day. When asked what device they normally use to access the internet, 25% of smartphone owners say that they mostly go online using their phone, rather than with a computer. While many of these individuals have other sources of online access at home, roughly one third of these “cell mostly” internet users lack a high-speed home broadband connection.

The Mobile Election 2012

What's Next for Mobile?Campaigns and Elections: Apps and video will move mobile forward for campaigns in 2012. For campaigns looking to make their mark with mobile in 2012, it’s no longer just about text.

Many online strategists expect SMS to actually take a backseat next year as the presidential cycle ushers in a new world of mobile apps and an expanded use of video.

The reason is simple: Smartphone use has grown exponentially over the past two years, making this coming election cycle the one in which mobile use by campaigns should explode.

In December of 2008, just 14 percent of wireless customers in the U.S. were using smartphones. Now, according to the latest numbers from the Pew Internet and American Life Project, more than a third of all Americans are using smartphones.

“Research has shown that by the end of 2011, smartphone usage will reach 50 percent,” says Cami Longstreet Zimmer, president of Campaign Touch Mobile Solutions. “Mobile doubles every six months, so having a mobile strategy for your campaign is a must.”

Pew Report: Generations Online

According to a December 2010 Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project research report a key fact to keep in mind is that younger cell-only age groups regularly use FaceBook or other social hubs. Milliennials, those ages 18-33, are more likely to access the internet with a mobile phone and milliennials still surpass their elders in use of social network sites.

However, internet users in Gen X (those ages 34-45) and older cohorts are rapidly catching up to Millennials in online activities. All age groups now depend on the Internet for news. Among the major trends in online activities:

65% Of Online Adults Use Social Networking Sites

Who uses social networking sites? Pew Research Center: The pace with which users have flocked to social networking sites has been staggering; in a first survey about social networking sites in February 2005, just 8% of internet users -- or 5% of all adults -- said they used them.

Now, a new survey by Pew internet & American Life Project finds that 65% say they use a social networking site like MySpace, Facebook or LinkedIn, up from 61% one year ago. Only email and search engines are used more frequently than social networking tools.

That's more than double the percentage that reported social networking site usage in 2008 (29%). And for the first time in Pew Internet surveys, it means that more than half of all adults (51%) use social networking sites.

Among internet users, social networking sites are most popular with women, young adults under age 30, and parents.

Young adult women ages 18-29 are the power users of social networking; fully 89% of those who are online use the sites overall and 69% do so on an average day.

As of May 2011, there are no significant differences in use of social networking sites based on race and ethnicity, household income, education level, or whether the internet user lives in an urban, suburban, or rural environment.

See the full report for a more detailed analysis of how Americans use social networking sites at pewinternet.org.

Saturday, October 10, 2009

Learning from Obama’s Online Success

Regardless of any other advantages Barack Obama possessed in the 2008 election season, Obama’s ability to raise as much money as his campaign could reasonably absorb from record numbers of small online supporter donations was decisive in helping to maintain him as a leading first tier of candidate. But, fundraising was only one component of Obama’s carefully nurtured "new media" relationship with his supporters, which ran through many channels and had as a single ultimate goal: electing him President. (click the graphic to read the PDF report)

First, it must be made clear that Obama’s "new media" department was NOT a part of the campaign’s "tech team." Instead, it was an independent branch of the campaign, coequal with communications, field and finance, and was in fact as much a client of the technology folks as, say, the press department was. Like other department heads, new media team leader Joe Rospars was a central part of the campaign’s top-level planning and decision-making processes, and he reported directly to overall campaign manager David Plouffe.

How the Tea Party Used Obama's Digital Playbook To Gain Power

The biggest story of the U.S. midterm election has been the growing influence of the Tea Party movement.

Since their first rallies in early 2009, these vocal, visible conservatives have succeeded in shifting the center of American political discourse to the right.

This election cycle, Tea Partiers have gone a step further, successfully backing primary challengers against moderate Republicans like Delaware's Mike Castle.

So how has this confederation of online, conservative activists used new media to build their growing political base? Click here to read the entire PBS series on this topic.

PBS: How the Tea Party Utilized Digital Media to Gain Power

Rebooting Politics 2.0: A Conversation with the Obama Campaign's New Media Team

David Plouffe's book, "The Audacity to Win: The Inside Story and Lessons of Barack Obama's Historic Victory," from Viking publishing, covers the inside story of Obama's presidential campaign. (click book image to go to Amazon)

Plouffe was the campaign manager for Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign. After winning the election on Nov. 4, 2008, President-elect Obama credited Plouffe in his acceptance speech, calling him “the unsung hero of this campaign, who built the best political campaign, I think, in the history of the United States of America.”

Plouffe is credited with the campaign’s successful overall strategy in the race for the Democratic Party presidential nomination and the general election by maintaining discipline over communications to deliver a consistent campaign message through a broad spectrum of media channels.

Obama's success owes a lot, of course, to his message of "change," but there was something more subtle at work, too. It was not just the message and the man and the speeches that swayed Democratic voters, it was the way the campaign folded the man and the message and the speeches into a systemic branding effort.

Friday, October 9, 2009

Social Media Engagement Will Decide Election 2012


Digital Politics Radio: Engagement with online political ads & content more significant than with consumer brands with viewers showing strong desire to share political content on social media and ways to establish an online conversation. Interview with Jay Samit, CEO SocialVibe.
--------------------------------

Digital Politics Radio: Value exchange web ad engagement, insights about targeting, sharing, persuasion, fund raising and turning online social media friends into "digital block captains." Interview with Jay Samit, CEO SocialVibe.
A Socialvibe study shows social media will play a vital role in determining the 2012 election. With a 94% participation rate for engagement on political advertising campaigns the Socialvibe study shows that Facebook friends, not the evening news or TV advertisements, will inform most voters.

The SocialVibe study (PDF) finds people are more likely to share interesting news articles, videos or online petitions with one-another via Facebook or email than they are to watch the nightly news.

More than ever before, voters expect to be given an opportunity to express themselves and interact with information by sharing with friends, posting to Facebook, tweeting and commenting on posts.Candidates must effectively engage the social sphere from the outset to remain competitive in this election cycle.

Social Media Voters More Influenced by Facebook Friends Than Evening News

A research study released in
June 2011 by digital agency SocialVibe found that 94% of voting-age social media users are more likely to watch an entire political message viewed online, and then 39% will share it with an average of 130 friends.

According to the study social media users are more likely to share persuasive political information with friends and colleagues in a matter of seconds from their computer or mobile device as opposed to making phone calls or canvassing. For that reason, social media users are more likely to be influenced by Facebook “friends” than the evening news.

The study also found that an investment of $25,000 in a campaign that engages social media users could spread the content online to people of voting age in all 50 states within 24 hours. That’s a lot of bang for the buck.

The SocialVibe study also indicated that political ad campaigns continue to shift more advertising budgets to online and mobile advertising. But it gets a little tricky because the campaigns have the challenge of presenting political messages in such a way that supporters want to share the information.

The key is to facilitate the users or political supporters to share messages or campaigns. Thus, the campaigners will need to become more creative in order to engage and develop loyalty to persuade others such as “friends” to be engaged as well.

The study indicates five key messages for the 2012 political season: Use Facebook and campaign Web sites to engage supporters, supporters carry social media message, go mobile, remember social email, and build loyalty through engaged advertising.

All in all, politicians will have a unique challenge of honestly connecting with people one on one as a personal experience. Approach them online in a conversation with a message that is convenient and beneficial for the social media user.

“Most people like to share personal views and beliefs. Allow people to engage with and personalize messages: This is what drives sharing,” concludes Jay Samit, CEO SocialVibe.

Thursday, October 8, 2009

How Candidates Can Use the Internet to Win in 2010 - Intro

Running for state legislature, a congressional seat, a governorship or even the U.S. Senate is different than running for president, and most down-ballot candidates have been reluctant to do much more than dip their toes into the digital waters so far. That’s likely to change soon, since despite the vast gap between a national race and one for dog-catcher, many of the same online political rules apply and most of the same technologies are available. Here’s why state- and local-level campaigns should pay attention to the potential of internet-based politics:

How Candidates Can Use the Internet to Win in 2010 - Old Is New

Online politics may look new, but most of what a campaign does over the internet is really just a reincarnation of some classic political act. For instance, think of a website as the electronic version of a storefront office, while the process of working with bloggers is a lot like old-school print or broadcast media relations.

But compared with traditional political tools, the internet truly excels at maintaining relationships with many people at once. Channels like Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and in particular email connect campaigns directly with their donors and volunteers, providing a means to distribute news, messaging points, event invitations and appeals for time and money. With planning and effort, the connection can go both ways, letting a campaign actively tap the social connections and even the creativity of its supporters.

Political professionals trained in the broadcast era often have trouble adapting to the back-and-forth nature of online communications (TV ads aren’t exactly interactive), but the rewards for embracing it can be tremendous. As Barack Obama showed in 2008, campaigns that actively engage their supporters can ask an immense amount from them in return.

How Candidates Can Use the Internet to Win in 2010 - Key Considerations

Once a campaign has the basic technology in place, it can begin to take full advantage of the Internet to deliver donors, volunteers and voters back to the campaign website. With new social communities like blogs, Facebook, YouTube, MySpace and Twitter creating fresh fishing holes, much of a campaign’s online outreach will take place in very public venues.

But politicians and their staffs can also reach out behind the scenes, for instance sending emails or Facebook messages to selected bloggers, tweeters and activists, usually in the hope of creating connections that will lead to more public affirmations of support. Campaigns can target online advertising with a different kind of precision, reaching people with appeals and messages that match the content they’re reading or the keywords they enter into a search engine.

The variety of outreach outlets available to online communicators can be overwhelming, so let’s start with a few basic principles to help sort out the options.

Candidates Use Google Apps To Run Their Campaigns


Google Groups part 1


Google Groups part 1



Google Docs lets you create, share, and collaborate on documents online.


Sharing your Google Docs while maintaining control over who can access your files.

Email has been the most common way to communicate online, even for a political campaign. Most campaigns have their own email address with their own domain name (like Michael@michaelfortexas.com). An alternative to paying for a commercial Internet service provider (ISP) for a website domain with email email is a very power and free solution: Google Apps.

As long as you have fewer than 50 users the system is free. The domain (i.e. www.michaelfortexas.com) is linked to a Google email server.

The interface looks almost exactly like a gmail account. You have access to not only email, but docs, calendar, etc.

Furthermore, it provides smart phone access with Google’s phone application, Google Sync.

Google Apps is a great solution for any campaign. It is relatively quick to set up so if you have a simple site with a tight budget, you might as well tell your webmaster to go ahead and set it up. At the very least, having your domain name in your email address would be free advertising.

Google Groups lets you quickly find and and participate in ongoing discussions among group members.

Google Groups is a little like using email to create and post messages. But Groups is a discussion forum where all members can read and respond to discussions in various topic threads.

Google Docs lets lets multiple people collaborate together to concurrently read and update one copy of documents like spreadsheets, slide presentations and word docs.

You'll be able to stay in the loop even when you're on the move, with the new mobile browser experience.

Robert Willington, online campaign strategist for Scott Brown’s campaign to win special election to Edward Kennedy's Massachusetts Senate seat, was a major proponent of using Google apps. (WSJ) Willington's Twitter feed was littered with references to Google apps. He even tweeted that “It’s amazing how google docs is the foundation of the Brown campaign.”

Mr. Willington said in an interview that the campaign made so much use of Google apps because the tools were efficient and readily available to campaign workers. “We didn’t have much money,” he said. “We needed to be as efficient and quick as possible.” He said he wouldn’t have exact figures on the campaign’s online ad budget until after the election.

Google Apps
Google Sites
Documents
Spreadsheets
Presentations
Forms
Drawings
Docs list
Gmail
Google Enterprise

Wednesday, October 7, 2009

How Campaign Ads and the Internet Shape Participation

Watch video of a Sept. 30,2009 talk by Dhavan V. Shah, an expert on the social psychology of media influence on political judgment.

Modern political campaigns involve, and increasingly rely on, advertising and digital media. President Obamas recent campaign was a prime example of how effective use of the Internet can influence voters.

Shah is the Louis A. & Mary E. Maier-Bascom Professor of Journalism and Mass Communication and Political Science at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He received his doctorate in mass communication in 1999 from the University of Minnesota, where he also minored in political psychology.

His research concerns the social psychology of media influence, especially communication effects on political judgment, public opinion, lifestyle politics and civic participation. Shah has authored more than 60 articles and chapters and is currently working on three books.

Blogs, Social Networks and E-Politics

The Evolution of Campaign Websites.
Watch this five part series of videos with Professor Christine Williams as she comments on Blogs, Social Networks and E-Politics. Christine B. Williams is a Professor of International Studies and Government at Bentley University.

She studies political communication with an emphasis on new and emerging technologies. Recently her research has focused on Internet-hosted technologies. In 2000, Professor Christine Williams and her research team began analyzing the content of U.S. House and Senate campaign websites, a research project that has continued through the campaign cycles of 2004 and 2006. She is now analyzing Election 2008.

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Republicans Out-Tweet Democrats


U.S. News: Twitter On Capitol Hill
While progressive blogs, with the encouragement of DNC Chairman Howard Dean, helped power Democratic electoral wins in 2006 and 2008, many in the Democratic party have been reticent about, and towards, its blogosphere echo chamber and the even the adoption of new media tools and strategies.

And now it seems that reticence has carried over into the use of Twitter. [Politico.com]

Nearly twice as many Republicans as Democrats have accounts on the social networking platform Twitter (101 compared with 57), and the GOP dominates Twitter usage by an even wider margin, according to a report released this week by the Congressional Research Service that analyzed two week long periods in July and August.

Monday, October 5, 2009

Politics at the Speed of Light: Campaign Tactics in the Digital Age


April 2009 [53:25 minutes]
Personal Democracy Network: Listen to Phil de Vellis, a senior associate and Vice President of New Media for Murphy Putnam Media, talk about employing digital media tools for political campaign support.

Philip has a wide range of professional experience in commercial post-production, politics, and Internet communications. He is best known as the creator of the "Vote Different" ad, which combined Apple's iconic "1984" spot with footage from Sen. Hillary Clinton's campaign website.

Saturday, October 3, 2009

How To Use YouTube For Politics


Feb 2010 [57:00 minutes] MP3
Listen to Kate Albright-Hanna, Who Worked On Obama's Campaign, Discuss Using Online Video to Grow A Candidate's Campaign.

Online to Offline Voter Engagement

Social media is merely a way to describe new tools in an old and narrow paradigm. However, this term has become obsolete in a world where technology has become a critical tool for connecting people not only to information and ideas, but also to other individuals, entities, both online and offline. This new ability to connect people is leveling the playing field and breaking down previous age, gender, socioeconomic, and circumstantial barriers to who can emerge as a leader, activist, or grassroots agent for change. The power of technology today will be determined not by web traffic and viewership, but by its ability to strengthen and more importantly facilitate human connections and relationships. [HuffingtonPost]

Persuasion comes in many forms. It happens when people are persuaded to click a web ad or text to a SMS short code message to begin a conversation that ultimately builds into a relationship. Through the conversation and relationship people be persuaded to give money, or send their e-mail address and cell phone number for future communication, to follow on Twitter. The ultimate goal is to engage people to become foot soldiers in the campaign through both online and offline activities.

Twitter for Fundraising and Community Organizing


April 2009 [58:57 minutes]
Personal Democracy Network: Listen to the discussion on "A Case Study On Using Twitter for Fundraising and Community Organizing."

CNBC - The Facebook Obsession

"The Facebook Obsession": "The Facebook Obsession" is the real story behind the rise of the largest social-media site in the world, told through the company's founders, friends and foes. NBC Correspondent Lester Holt delivers a comprehensive look at how this Internet phenomenon, with half a billion users, is affecting society in ways unimagined. Dec 2010

Thursday, October 1, 2009

Constituent Relationship Management

The art of relationship management is not new and can be found in many forms, addressing specific constituency relationships like business to customer, non-profit service organization to donors and political parties and candidates to voters.

In the business world customer relationship management (CRM), focuses on business success by maximizing an organization's ability to identify and track customers' needs and behaviors in order to develop stronger relationships with them.

In the sphere of politics constituent relationship management (CRM), similarly focuses on electoral success by maximizing a party’s or candidate’s ability to identify and track voters' views and behaviors in order to develop a relationship with them and motivate them to vote. Just as CRM has been automate through web software systems over the last two decades, CRM automated through web software systems.

Why some Democrats And Independents Don't Vote Down Ballots

This country saw a huge increase in voter registration during the 2008 presidential election year, including big numbers among younger voters, people of color, non-college voters, as well as college students, and unmarried women. These groups of newly registered voters are politically progressive and disproportionately Democratic. The problem progressives faced in 2008, just as in prior election years, is that not all of this energy was transferred to down ballot races.

An EMILY's List survey conducted that year by Garin-Hart-Yang Research Group shows that 65 percent of younger people believe whoever is elected President will make "a lot of difference" in their lives; this number drops to 32 when asked about Governor and 26 percent when asked about Congress.

Comprehensive Guide for Candidates and Campaign Workers

Winning Your Election The Wellstone Way by DemBlogNews

Robert's Rules of Order

This post contains content that may be useful to those who intend to attend a party convention as a delegate or who just want to learn a useful set of meeting skills.


Robert's Rules of Order Basics

Robert's Rules of Order is the short title of a book containing rules of order intended to be adopted as a parliamentary authority for use by a deliberative assembly.

Published under the name Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (and often referred as RONR) it is the most widely used parliamentary authority in the U.S., according to the National Association of Parliamentarians.

NAP is a professional association of approximately 4,000 members which provides education and accreditation certifications for parliamentarians. (Wikipedia: Robert's Rules of Order)

Updated Jan. 6, 2012 - The Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised, 11th edition, published in 2011, is intended to replace all previous editions as the parliamentary authority in organizations whose bylaws prescribe “Robert's Rules of Order,” “Robert's Rules of Order Revised,” “Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised,” or “the current edition of” any of these titles, or the like, without specifying a particular edition.

Useful Links

Books


Gerald Smith was the first sigma appointed as national director of Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity serving from 1978 until 1990. His purpose for producing this training video series was to educate the delegates in parliamentary procedure so they would be able to take control of their fraternity as well as other African American organizations of which they where members.

  • Part 1 - Parliamentary Procedure: Background and Basic Rules
  • Part 2 - Parliamentary Procedure: Officers, Order of Business and Motions
  • Part 3 - Parliamentary Procedure: Privileged Motions
  • Part 4 - Subsidiary Motions: Amend, Lay On Table
  • Part 5 - Subsidiary Motion: Limit or Extend Debate
  • Part 6 - Credentials and Rules

Robert's Rules of Order Motions Chart

Citizen Journalism

What is it?

"Citizen journalism" describes the different kinds of journalism people can do on their own, without media companies or professional salaried journalists necessarily involved. This can be as simple as regularly commenting on news story in the Dallas Morning News that adds information or perspective the reporter left out, writing letters to the editor or as demanding as self-publishing a news and editorial blog on the Internet.


Arianna Huffington, Co-founder and Editor in-Chief of the Huffington Post, talks about citizen journalism and the role it can play in the years to come.


OklahomaHorizonTV
Impact of Social Media on Journalism
Citizen journalists are members of the public who "play an active role in the process of collecting, reporting, analyzing, fact checking and disseminating news and information," according to the seminal 2003 report, "We Media: How Audiences are Shaping the Future of News and Information."

Authors Bowman and Willis say, "The intent of this participation is to provide independent, reliable, accurate, wide-ranging and relevant information that a democracy requires."

The idea behind citizen journalism is that citizens can exercise their right of free speech by using the tools of modern technology and the Internet to augment and fact-check corporate media companies, either on their own or in collaboration with others.